Ever thought what it would be like
to train or perform like an Olympic
athlete? Having read The Sports Gene: http://thesportsgene.com/
by David Epstein and listened to recent podcasts by Mark Sission of Mark’s Daily Apple with the entrepreneurs
at DNA Fit: http://www.dnafit.com/us/ ,
a new research group providing genetic testing/analysis for athletes hoping to optimize
their training. From energy/nutrient utilization and susceptibility to connective
tissue injuries to one’s predilection for strength based training versus long-duration
endurance exercise, DNA Fit hopes to give athletes a wide variety of data so
that they can get the most out of their pursuits. While I am very open-minded
when it comes to epigenetic research and studying the interplay between our
genes and the environment, we must always take pause when new genomic research hits
the scene- touting to have found numerous genes showing strong associations
with specific physiologic and metabolic functions related to athletic performance.
Of course, being an active person myself,
it would be quite fun and interesting to do a DNA Fit test just to see and
maybe rationalize in my mind what I already believe to be true with regards to
my overall athletic performance, optimal nutrition requirements and potential tendencies
to injury. The reality is, however, I have no money for such testing and waiting
a few years for the research to evolve and my pockets to fill with at least a
little cash may be the better option.
While people like David Epstein and
the geneticists at DNA Fit have been studying the role of specific genes in
creating the champion Olympian, I had perhaps a more relevant question for the
population as a whole that arose from a happenstance encounter with a patient
during my recent ambulatory internal medicine rotation. The patient was a 46
year old male, who was by BMI standards, morbidly obese and without significant
weight loss in recent months. His diet was improving but still consisted of
primarily highly processed and refined foods including a fair share of Hardee’s.
In addition, he worked a relatively sedentary job, did not exercise and seemed
to be sleeping only 5-6 hours a night at best. Sound like recipe for poor
health to you? Other than being obese, however, his metabolic parameters were remarkably
within normal limits. From fasting and post prandial glucose to lipids and inflammatory
marker such as CRP, he seemed to be free from disease. With no evidence of coronary
artery disease, diabetes, dyslipidemia or even hypertension, this guy was managing
to defy the odds of his poor lifestyle choices. While there appeared to be
almost nothing about his environment conducive to optimal genetic expression,
he was still functioning at a relatively high level. How was this man eating
donuts and drinking Big Gulps without any evidence of metabolic derangements
and better glucose control than his health care providers? Could the blessing
of amazing genetics be the answer?
So my questions for the smarter people
of the world is this: When it comes to identifying the genes that seem to be
associated with optimal health, should we be studying the gold medal Olympians
or should we switch our attention to a different population? Was my patient the
individual that the geneticists at 23 and Me and DNA Fit should actually be
studying? Are individuals like my patient, who appear on the outside to be the
antithesis of health, the ones who have the genetic secrets to avoid chronic
disease even in the face of a very poor lifestyle? I do not have many answers
to these questions, only more speculation into the complicated nature of gene-environment
interaction. One thing is for certain, however, there are likely hundreds or
thousands of individuals working and living who will never compete for a place
on the podium, yet the metabolic and genetic heroics at play within their cells
and tissues is probably worth a gold medal.